Model comparison

Grok Build 0.1 vs Magistral Medium

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Grok Build 0.1 xAI

36.4

Rank #216 Reported

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok Build 0.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Magistral Medium in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 8.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 50.2% for Grok Build 0.1 and 39.2% for Magistral Medium.
  • Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper at $1 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $5 for Magistral Medium.
  • Magistral Medium accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok Build 0.1 and Magistral Medium specifications
Grok Build 0.1Magistral Medium
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Noometry Index36.435.2
Released2026-04-162025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K262K
Max output256K16K
Input $ / M tokens$1$2
Output $ / M tokens$2$5
Results tracked322

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads

Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Magistral Medium
SciCode50.2%39.2%
LMArena Coding—1319

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), Magistral Medium: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Magistral Medium
GBAEval2.4%—

Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads

Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Magistral Medium
CritPt9.1%0.3%
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—16.2%
ARC-AGI-1—6.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1267

Math Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Magistral Medium
LMArena Math—1250

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Magistral Medium
LMArena Expert—1223

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Magistral Medium
LMArena Non-English—1232
LMArena Chinese—1227
LMArena French—1267
LMArena German—1248
LMArena Japanese—1175
LMArena Korean—1125
LMArena Russian—1224
LMArena Spanish—1271

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Magistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following—1254

Long Context Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Magistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query—1295

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok Build 0.1: —, Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok Build 0.1Magistral Medium
LMArena Text—1255
LMArena Creative Writing—1245
LMArena Multi-Turn—1275

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Magistral Medium?

Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Magistral Medium?

Grok Build 0.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Magistral Medium lists at $2 and $5.

Is Grok Build 0.1 or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Magistral Medium does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Magistral Medium share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper