Model comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) vs Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 15.2.
Side by side
| Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 35.1 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2024-12-06 | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 54 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.4 (#315), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 13.5% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 38.2% | — |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| WeirdML | 25.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 63.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1350 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.9% | — |
| CadEval | 30% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 28.1 (#92), Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 11.4% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 15.2 (#318), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 31.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 37.8% | — |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| EnigmaEval | 1.1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 78.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1346 | — |
| DTBench | 63.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.36 | — |
| LiveBench | 66.9% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 37.9 (#146), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 75.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1352 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 82.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 32.0 (#213), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 64.1% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 6.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 73.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 55.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| MMLU | 79.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 36.5 (#79), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1158 | — |
| GeoBench | 77% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 47.4 (#149), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1373 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1294 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1363 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 74.4 (#97), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 85.8% | — |
| IFEval | 84.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1336 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 38.1 (#203), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 61.1% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025): 49.5 (#190), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1354 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1340 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.8% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1128 | — |
| WildBench | 80% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 51.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) better than Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.4 to 35.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 28.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash (Feb 2025) has 54 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.