Model comparison
Grok 4 vs Grok 4.3
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 10 categories and Grok 4.3 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 42.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 84% for Grok 4 and 93.3% for Grok 4.3.
Side by side
| Grok 4 | Grok 4.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 47.8 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2025-07-09 | 2026-04-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 48 | 40 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 49.9 (#44), Grok 4.3: 41.3 (#117)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 45.7% | 49.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1408 | 1415 |
| Aider Polyglot | 79.6% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1357 |
| SciCode | — | 47.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 944.17 |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 32.1 (#62), Grok 4.3: 27.6 (#93)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1142 | 1165 |
| Terminal-Bench | 27.2% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 63% | — |
| GDPval | 21.1% | — |
| Cybench | 43% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.3% | — |
| BALROG | 43.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 8% |
| METR Time Horizons | 66.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 35.26 |
Reasoning Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 36.9 (#59), Grok 4.3: 34.9 (#60)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 28% | 25% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1397 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.46 | 149.13 |
| ForecastBench | 60.9 | 60.3 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 16% | — |
| SimpleBench | 60.5% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 73.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 55.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 66.7% | — |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| DTBench | — | 90.7% |
| LMCA | — | 38.3% |
Math Too close to call
Grok 4: 46.5 (#58), Grok 4.3: 45.8 (#60)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 84% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 42.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 14.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 11% |
| Omni-MATH | 60.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 19.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 53.7 (#50), Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#57)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87% | 88.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1385 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 33.2% |
| MMLU-Pro | 85.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 72.7% | — |
Multimodal Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 33.1 (#89), Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#96)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1211 | 1231 |
| GeoBench | 45% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 0% |
Multilingual Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 52.0 (#98), Grok 4.3: 50.7 (#114)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1403 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1428 | 1423 |
| LMArena French | 1418 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1429 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1396 | 1379 |
| LMArena Korean | 1376 | 1357 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1399 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1419 | 1402 |
Instruction Following Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 79.4 (#4), Grok 4.3: 72.3 (#135)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1366 |
| IFEval | 94.9% | — |
Long Context Grok 4 leads
Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1393 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 94.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Grok 4: 58.7 (#111), Grok 4.3: 58.6 (#112)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1412 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1397 | 1380 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1416 | 1406 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.9% | — |
| WildBench | 79.7% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1075 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4 better than Grok 4.3?
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4 or Grok 4.3 better for coding?
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 41.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Grok 4.3 share?
25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.3 has 40.