Model comparison

Grok 4 Fast vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 5 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 42.8.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4 Fast and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Grok 4 FastStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index39.442.3
Released2025-09-192026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked3019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding14291436
LMArena WebDev1159—
WeirdML42.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86), Step 3.5 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3.5 Flash
τ²-bench Banking15.7%—
Cybench30%—
LMArena Search1171—

Reasoning Too close to call

Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14121411
ARC-AGI-25.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%
ARC-AGI-148.5%—
DTBench82.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index144.2—
ForecastBench60.5—

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math14191408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads

Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert14111421
Vectara Hallucination Rate19.7%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English13961385
LMArena Chinese14571447
LMArena French14311421
LMArena German13831405
LMArena Japanese13521354
LMArena Korean13571352
LMArena Russian13891385
LMArena Spanish14151419

Instruction Following Too close to call

Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13871385

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query14151402
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4 FastStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text14071403
LMArena Creative Writing13871357
LMArena Multi-Turn14141405

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 Fast better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 Fast or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Step 3.5 Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper