Model comparison
Grok 4 Fast vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 Fast scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 42.2.
Side by side
| Grok 4 Fast | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2025-09-19 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 30 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1429 | 1390 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1159 | — |
| WeirdML | 42.9% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | 15.7% | — |
| Cybench | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1412 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 66.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 48.5% | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.2 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.5 | — |
Math Too close to call
Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1419 | 1414 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1411 | 1395 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 19.7% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1396 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1357 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1389 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1431 | — |
| LMArena German | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1352 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1387 | 1374 |
Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1384 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 94.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1387 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4 Fast better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4 Fast or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.