Model comparison
Grok 4 Fast vs Qwen Turbo
Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4 Fast leads 36.1 to 14.5.
Side by side
| Grok 4 Fast | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 26.8 |
| Released | 2025-09-19 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 30 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 4 Fast: 32.3 (#264), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1160 | — |
| WeirdML | 42.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1429 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4 Fast: 29.3 (#80), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | 15.7% | — |
| Cybench | 30% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1171 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Grok 4 Fast: 22.5 (#179), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 5.3% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 66.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 48.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | — |
| DTBench | 82.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 144.21 | — |
| ForecastBench | 60.5 | — |
Math Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 36.1 (#126), Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1419 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Grok 4 Fast leads
Grok 4 Fast: 31.5 (#211), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 19.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1411 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4 Fast: 51.5 (#106), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1458 | — |
| LMArena French | 1433 | — |
| LMArena German | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1414 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4 Fast: 73.4 (#116), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1388 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 94.4% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 4 Fast: 60.2 (#96), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Fast | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4 Fast better than Qwen Turbo?
Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 26.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4 Fast and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 Fast has 30 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.