Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Grok 4 Fast
Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4 Fast leads 38.9 to 9.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 45.9% for Gemini 1.0 Pro and 82.7% for Grok 4 Fast.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.3 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | 2025-09-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 32.2 (#275), Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1429 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1159 |
| WeirdML | — | 42.9% |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 1.0 Pro: —, Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 15.7% |
| Cybench | — | 30% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |
Reasoning Grok 4 Fast leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 17.1 (#296), Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1412 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | 82.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 117.04 | 144.2 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 5.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 48.5% |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.5 |
Math Grok 4 Fast leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 9.3 (#321), Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1419 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4 Fast leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.6 (#291), Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1411 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 19.7% |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.4 (#252), Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1396 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1457 |
| LMArena French | 1145 | 1431 |
| LMArena German | 1125 | 1383 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | 1352 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1389 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1119 | 1415 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1357 |
Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.6 (#267), Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1387 |
Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#249), Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1415 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |
Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.0 (#264), Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1407 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1131 | 1387 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1414 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Grok 4 Fast?
Grok 4 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 27.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (32.2 vs 32.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Grok 4 Fast share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.