Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Yi-1.5-34B

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.6

Rank #289 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 62.8 to 14.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 92.7% for Grok 4.7 and 32% for Yi-1.5-34B.
  • Yi-1.5-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7Yi-1.5-34B
ProviderxAI01.AI
Noometry Index53.130.6
Released2026-09-212024-05-13
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked3921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.4 (#272)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Coding14271169
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—33.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Yi-1.5-34B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Yi-1.5-34B
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Yi-1.5-34B: 22.5 (#191)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14131160
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA49.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Yi-1.5-34B: 27.5 (#249)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math14071182
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—
MATH Level 5—25.5%

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#295)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Yi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond92.7%32%
LMArena Expert14221144
SimpleQA Verified56%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Yi-1.5-34B: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.3 (#256)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English13891121
LMArena Chinese14551213
LMArena French14551156
LMArena Russian13971091
LMArena Spanish14001121
LMArena German—1111
LMArena Japanese—1021
LMArena Korean—1005

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.2 (#257)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14041139

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#248)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query14131143

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.4 (#257)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Yi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text13991173
LMArena Creative Writing13911135
LMArena Multi-Turn13931153
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 30.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.7 or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Yi-1.5-34B share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper