Noometry

Model comparison

Codellama 34b Instruct vs Grok 4.7

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Codellama 34b Instruct Meta

30.8

Rank #287 Confirmed

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 34b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.0 to 28.2.
  • Codellama 34b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Codellama 34b InstructGrok 4.7
ProviderMetaxAI
Noometry Index30.853.1
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1439

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.5 (#314), Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Coding10461427
FrontierCode—47.6%
CursorBench—46.3%
LMArena WebDev—1639
FrontierSWE—29.5%
SciCode—57.8%
BigCodeBench Instruct29%—
BigCodeBench Complete37.1%—
HumanEval+43.9%—
MBPP+56.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.7
APEX-Agents—54.6%
GDP.pdf—22.8%
Vending-Bench 2—10,537

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 19.6 (#255), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Hard Prompts10321413
NYT Connections (extended)—76.8%
CritPt—18%
Chess Puzzles—38%
Mystery Game Puzzles—29%
DTBench—96%
LMCA—49.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.53

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 31.0 (#230), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Math10561407
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—53%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—98.1%
ProofBench—34%

Knowledge Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.7
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—56%
LMArena Expert—1422

Multimodal Not comparable

Codellama 34b Instruct: —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Vision—1228
Blueprint-Bench 2—32.5%
Furniture Assembly—20.8%

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 25.8 (#284), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Non-English10111389
LMArena Chinese9761455
LMArena French—1455
LMArena Russian—1397
LMArena Spanish—1400

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 52.2 (#291), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Instruction Following10281404

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 30.9 (#284), Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Longer Query10131413

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Codellama 34b Instruct: 28.2 (#297), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)

BenchmarkCodellama 34b InstructGrok 4.7
LMArena Text10661399
LMArena Creative Writing10321391
LMArena Multi-Turn10151393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2007

Frequently asked questions

Is Codellama 34b Instruct better than Grok 4.7?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Codellama 34b Instruct or Grok 4.7 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Codellama 34b Instruct and Grok 4.7 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 34b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper