Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.7 leads 62.8 to 35.2.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Grok 4.7Step 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index53.139.2
Released2026-09-21—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked3912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding14271316
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Step 2 16k Exp 202412
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts14131299
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA49.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math14071304
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert14221279
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified56%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English13891290
LMArena Chinese14551331
LMArena Russian13971324
LMArena French1455—
LMArena Spanish1400—

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following14041287

Long Context Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query14131307

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text13991321
LMArena Creative Writing13911328
LMArena Multi-Turn13931292
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.7 or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper