Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #35 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 25.9.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderDeepSeekStepFun
Noometry Index53.639.2
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.9 (#59), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding14571316
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1582—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#30), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts14441299
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.49—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.3 (#37), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math14271304
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.4 (#48), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert14411279
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.0 (#72), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English14201290
LMArena Chinese14681331
LMArena Russian14281324
LMArena French1439—
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Korean1384—
LMArena Spanish1436—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 74.9 (#81), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following14211287

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#85), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query14341307

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 63.8 (#61), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text14321321
LMArena Creative Writing14031328
LMArena Multi-Turn14491292
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper