Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3 Coder Plus

Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#37); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Summary

  • Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper at $1 / $5 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 500K.
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and Qwen3 Coder Plus specifications
Grok 4.7Qwen3 Coder Plus
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index53.1—
Released2026-09-212025-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K1.05M
Max output500K66K
Input $ / M tokens$2$1
Output $ / M tokens$6$5
Results tracked391

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Qwen3 Coder Plus
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—
LMArena Coding1427—
ALE-Bench—456.5

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Qwen3 Coder Plus
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Qwen3 Coder Plus
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1413—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA49.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Qwen3 Coder Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—
LMArena Math1407—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Qwen3 Coder Plus
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified56%—
LMArena Expert1422—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Non-English1389—
LMArena Chinese1455—
LMArena French1455—
LMArena Russian1397—
LMArena Spanish1400—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1404—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Longer Query1413—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Qwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Text1399—
LMArena Creative Writing1391—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—
LMArena Multi-Turn1393—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#37); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Qwen3 Coder Plus?

Qwen3 Coder Plus is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $5 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Plus does, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Qwen3 Coder Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Plus has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper