Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3 Coder Plus

DeepSeek V4 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #32 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $5 for Qwen3 Coder Plus.
  • Qwen3 Coder Plus accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Plus specifications
DeepSeek V4 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index53.6—
Released2026-04-242025-07-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M1.05M
Max output393K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.60$5
Results tracked411

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.6 (#56), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
ALE-Bench1,306456.5
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1581—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
LMArena Coding1457—

Reasoning Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#25), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1443—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.51—

Math Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.0 (#31), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—
LMArena Math1427—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.5 (#43), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—
LMArena Expert1441—

Multilingual Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.2 (#71), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Non-English1420—
LMArena Chinese1467—
LMArena French1438—
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1403—
LMArena Korean1383—
LMArena Russian1428—
LMArena Spanish1437—

Instruction Following Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 75.1 (#76), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1421—

Long Context Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#81), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Longer Query1435—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 64.0 (#59), Qwen3 Coder Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashQwen3 Coder Plus
LMArena Text1432—
LMArena Creative Writing1403—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—
LMArena Multi-Turn1449—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Qwen3 Coder Plus?

DeepSeek V4 Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#32); Qwen3 Coder Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Qwen3 Coder Plus?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Plus lists at $1 and $5.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Plus does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Qwen3 Coder Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Plus has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper