Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Muse Glimmer
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.7 leads 55.0 to 38.7.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | 1355 |
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1417 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1395 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1419 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1388 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1393 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1374 |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1398 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Muse Glimmer?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.7 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Muse Glimmer share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.