Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Longcat Flash Chat
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 4 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 40.1 to 18.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 76.8% for Grok 4.7 and 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat.
- Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Longcat Flash Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meituan |
| Noometry Index | 46.6 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1423 | 1471 |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1636 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | 17.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1409 | 1440 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43.9% |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1393 | 1441 |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads
Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1413 | 1454 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Longcat Flash Chat: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1476 | 1465 |
| LMArena Russian | 1396 | 1396 |
| LMArena French | — | 1457 |
| LMArena German | — | 1409 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1372 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1445 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1411 |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1425 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Longcat Flash Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1397 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1389 | 1418 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Longcat Flash Chat?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.7 or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Longcat Flash Chat share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.