Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Llama 13b

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.0 to 13.8.
  • Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and Llama 13b specifications
Grok 4.7Llama 13b
ProviderxAIMeta
Noometry Index53.124.4
Released2026-09-212023-02-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked3921

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Llama 13b
LMArena Coding1427683
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Llama 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Llama 13b
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Llama 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts1413728
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53100.58
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA49.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard—37.9%
HellaSwag—79.2%
LAMBADA—75.2%
PIQA—80.1%
WinoGrande—73%

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Llama 13b
LMArena Math1407838
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—
GSM8K—20.6%

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Llama 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Llama 13b
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified56%—
LMArena Expert1422—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—52.7%
BoolQ—78.7%
MMLU—47.7%
OpenBookQA—56.4%
TriviaQA—77.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Llama 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Llama 13b
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—
ScienceQA—43.3%

Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Llama 13b
LMArena Non-English1389819
LMArena Chinese1455—
LMArena French1455—
LMArena Russian1397—
LMArena Spanish1400—

Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Llama 13b
LMArena Instruction Following1404781

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Llama 13b: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Llama 13b
LMArena Longer Query1413—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Llama 13b
LMArena Text1399834
LMArena Creative Writing1391794
LMArena Multi-Turn1393753
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Llama 13b?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.7 or Llama 13b better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Llama 13b share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper