Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 26.1.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 53.1 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 39 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1427 | 1319 |
| FrontierCode | 47.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1639 | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 22.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,537 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | 1308 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 29% | — |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 49.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.53 | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1407 | 1273 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 53% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 34% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 56% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1422 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 32.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | 1305 |
| LMArena French | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1400 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1278 |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1399 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1303 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.7 or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.