Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #32 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.0

Rank #165 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 25.0.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderDeepSeekTencent
Noometry Index53.639.0
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4111

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.6 (#56), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding14571320
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1581—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#25), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts14431308
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.51—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.0 (#31), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math14271273
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—

Knowledge Not comparable

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.5 (#43), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—
LMArena Expert1441—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.2 (#71), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English14201285
LMArena Chinese14671358
LMArena Russian14281305
LMArena French1438—
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1403—
LMArena Korean1383—
LMArena Spanish1437—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 75.1 (#76), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following14211279

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#81), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query14351309

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 64.0 (#59), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text14321311
LMArena Creative Writing14031269
LMArena Multi-Turn14491303
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.6 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper