Noometry

Model comparison

DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek

53.6

Rank #32 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

41.8

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek V4 Flash leads 53.7 to 27.3.
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderDeepSeekTencent
Noometry Index53.641.8
Released2026-04-24—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked4113

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 47.6 (#56), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding14571389
FrontierCode18.8%—
LMArena WebDev1581—
SciCode49.9%—
WeirdML63%—
ALE-Bench1,306—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.7 (#25), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts14431399
ARC-AGI-261.4%—
SimpleBench61.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark52.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
ARC-AGI-189%—
CritPt16.6%—
Chess Puzzles33%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench90.9%—
LMCA41.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.51—

Math DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 60.0 (#31), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math14271414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions76.5%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202594.4%—
ProofBench56%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 55.5 (#43), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert14411395
GPQA Diamond91%—
SimpleQA Verified33.6%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 53.2 (#71), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English14201395
LMArena Chinese14671424
LMArena Korean13831403
LMArena Russian14281384
LMArena French1438—
LMArena German1418—
LMArena Japanese1403—
LMArena Spanish1437—

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 75.1 (#76), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following14211375

Long Context DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 43.8 (#81), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query14351384

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4 Flash: 64.0 (#59), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)

BenchmarkDeepSeek V4 FlashHunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text14321401
LMArena Creative Writing14031391
LMArena Multi-Turn14491393
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

DeepSeek V4 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4 Flash or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

DeepSeek V4 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.6 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4 Flash and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4 Flash has 41 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper