Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Laguna XS.2

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#19); Laguna XS.2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.8

Rank #19 Confirmed

Laguna XS.2 Poolside

32.5

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.6 scores higher in 2 categories and Laguna XS.2 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.6 leads 66.8 to 20.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 51% for Grok 4.6 and 0% for Laguna XS.2.
  • Laguna XS.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.6Laguna XS.2
ProviderxAIPoolside
Noometry Index56.832.5
Released2026-08-122026-04-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked492

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 58.0 (#14), Laguna XS.2: 34.1

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna XS.2
LMArena WebDev16201302
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
LMArena Coding1464—
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#25), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna XS.2
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 61.3 (#18), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna XS.2
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1445—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.48—

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 66.8 (#19), Laguna XS.2: 20.3

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna XS.2
ProofBench51%0%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
LMArena Math1416—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#18), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna XS.2
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—
LMArena Expert1463—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 43.9 (#18), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna XS.2
LMArena Vision1265—
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 53.3 (#67), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna XS.2
LMArena Non-English1422—
LMArena Chinese1479—
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1425—
LMArena Japanese1383—
LMArena Korean1395—
LMArena Russian1427—
LMArena Spanish1408—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 75.6 (#59), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna XS.2
LMArena Instruction Following1431—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 44.4 (#62), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna XS.2
LMArena Longer Query1453—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 62.5 (#77), Laguna XS.2: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Laguna XS.2
LMArena Text1427—
LMArena Creative Writing1430—
LMArena Multi-Turn1422—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Laguna XS.2?

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#19); Laguna XS.2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Grok 4.6 or Laguna XS.2 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Laguna XS.2 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Laguna XS.2 has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper