Model comparison
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Laguna XS.2
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#20); Laguna XS.2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Google
PoolsideSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher in 2 categories and Laguna XS.2 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 61.8 to 20.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 26% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and 0% for Laguna XS.2.
- Laguna XS.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Laguna XS.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Poolside | |
| Noometry Index | 56.7 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2026-02-19 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12 | — |
| Results tracked | 71 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.7 (#88), Laguna XS.2: 34.1
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Laguna XS.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1446 | 1302 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.6% | — |
| DeepSWE | 11.7% | — |
| SciCode | 58.9% | — |
| GSO | 22.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 72.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1483 | — |
| MirrorCode | 8.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,161 | — |
| AlgoTune | 2.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#33), Laguna XS.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Laguna XS.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 80.2% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 35.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 26% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 47.8% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 22% | — |
| BALROG | 57% | — |
| ExploitBench | 26.1% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 17% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1211 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 77% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,774 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#9), Laguna XS.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Laguna XS.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 77.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 79.6% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 97.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 98% | — |
| CritPt | 17.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 55% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 36.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 79.4% | — |
| EBR-Bench | 14.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1484 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 34% | — |
| DTBench | 97.1% | — |
| LMCA | 53.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 154.92 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59 | — |
Math Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 61.8 (#28), Laguna XS.2: 20.3
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Laguna XS.2 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 26% | 0% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 59.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 26.8% | — |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 86.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1485 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 36.9% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3), Laguna XS.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Laguna XS.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 94.4% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 46.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 73.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1484 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 38.1 (#60), Laguna XS.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Laguna XS.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1296 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 26.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 26.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.1 (#11), Laguna XS.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Laguna XS.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1528 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1494 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1458 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1496 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1480 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.1 (#31), Laguna XS.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Laguna XS.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1465 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.3 (#17), Laguna XS.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Laguna XS.2 |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 20.8% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 16.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1482 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.3 (#36), Laguna XS.2: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Laguna XS.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1480 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1482 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1491 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1486 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better than Laguna XS.2?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#20); Laguna XS.2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview or Laguna XS.2 better for coding?
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview and Laguna XS.2 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71 scored results on Noometry and Laguna XS.2 has 2.