Model comparison
Grok 4.5 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.5 leads 56.1 to 28.5.
Side by side
| Grok 4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 55.0 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2026-07-08 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 500K | — |
| Max output | 500K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 52 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 52.2 (#35), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1474 | 1390 |
| DeepSWE | 53.8% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1553 | — |
| SciCode | 54.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 46.4% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,309 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#17), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 56.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | 47.9% | — |
| PostTrainBench | 23.4% | — |
| GBAEval | 65.4% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 14% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1213 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 3,887 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 56.1 (#25), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1462 | 1399 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 52.6% | — |
| SimpleBench | 70% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 83.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 87.2% | — |
| CritPt | 15.4% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 36% | — |
| DTBench | 96.5% | — |
| LMCA | 45.2% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 74.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.92 | — |
Math Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 60.9 (#35), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1459 | 1414 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 57.2% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 24.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 97.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 31% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#24), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1466 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 93.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 48.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.5: 37.6 (#72), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1288 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 27.3% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 22.5% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1452 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 54.4 (#42), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1496 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1404 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1448 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1456 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 76.0 (#48), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1446 | 1374 |
Long Context Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#56), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads
Grok 4.5: 65.8 (#42), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.5 | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1448 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1442 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1579 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.5 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.5 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.2 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.5 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.5 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.