Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Yi-34B

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 88.8% for Grok 4.3 and 14.7% for Yi-34B.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.3 and Yi-34B specifications
Grok 4.3Yi-34B
ProviderxAI01.AI
Noometry Index43.827.8
Released2026-04-172023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked4023

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Yi-34B
LMArena Coding14151112
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Yi-34B
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Yi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts13961104
Epoch Capabilities Index149.16117.39
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
DTBench90.7%—
LMCA38.3%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Yi-34B
LMArena Math13881114
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Yi-34B
GPQA Diamond88.8%14.7%
LMArena Expert13851061
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104), Yi-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Yi-34B
LMArena Vision1229—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Yi-34B
LMArena Non-English13851079
LMArena Chinese14221176
LMArena French14121081
LMArena German13951042
LMArena Japanese1379993
LMArena Korean1356959
LMArena Russian13991050
LMArena Spanish13981070

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Yi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following13661091

Long Context Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Yi-34B
LMArena Longer Query13931094

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Yi-34B
LMArena Text13971129
LMArena Creative Writing13801108
LMArena Multi-Turn14061113
EQ-Bench 41075—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Yi-34B?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.3 or Yi-34B better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Yi-34B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper