Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 28 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 28 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 41.8 to 31.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 55.2% for Grok 4.3 and 74.8% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
  • Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.60 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.3.

Side by side

Grok 4.3Qwen3.7 Plus
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.845.3
Released2026-04-172026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output30K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$1.60
Results tracked4032

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.7 Plus
SciCode47.3%45.5%
LMArena Coding14151473
FrontierCode—10.2%
LMArena WebDev1357—
WeirdML49.9%—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.7 Plus
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%74.8%
CritPt8%9.1%
Chess Puzzles25%24%
LMArena Hard Prompts13961460
DTBench90.7%84%
LMCA38.3%37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index149.16147.37
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.7 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%93.3%
LMArena Math13881466
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
ProofBench11%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond88.8%87.9%
LMArena Expert13851467
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—

Multimodal Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104), Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision12291279
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English13851445
LMArena Chinese14221510
LMArena French14121473
LMArena German13951471
LMArena Japanese13791413
LMArena Korean13561415
LMArena Russian13991457
LMArena Spanish13981457

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following13661440

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query13931455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGrok 4.3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text13971455
LMArena Creative Writing13801439
LMArena Multi-Turn14061460
EQ-Bench 41075—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.3 or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.60 per million output tokens; Grok 4.3 lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

Is Grok 4.3 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

28 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper