Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Palm 2

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.3 leads 58.5 to 25.6.

Side by side

Grok 4.3 and Palm 2 specifications
Grok 4.3Palm 2
ProviderxAIGoogle
Noometry Index43.830.0
Released2026-04-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked4010

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Palm 2
LMArena Coding1415994
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99), Palm 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Palm 2
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Palm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts13961005
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
DTBench90.7%—
LMCA38.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.16—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Palm 2
LMArena Math13881049
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Palm 2
GPQA Diamond88.8%—
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—
LMArena Expert1385—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104), Palm 2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Palm 2
LMArena Vision1229—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Palm 2
LMArena Non-English1385916
LMArena Chinese1422887
LMArena French1412—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1379—
LMArena Korean1356—
LMArena Russian1399—
LMArena Spanish1398—

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Palm 2
LMArena Instruction Following13661010

Long Context Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Palm 2
LMArena Longer Query13931010

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Palm 2
LMArena Text13971027
LMArena Creative Writing1380991
LMArena Multi-Turn1406994
EQ-Bench 41075—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Palm 2?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.3 or Palm 2 better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper