Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.6

Rank #80 Confirmed

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.2

Rank #265 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 7 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.3 leads 58.6 to 31.8.
  • Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.3 and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat specifications
Grok 4.3Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
ProviderxAINVIDIA
Noometry Index43.631.2
Released2026-04-17—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked409

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 41.3 (#117), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Coding14151025
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.6 (#93), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 34.9 (#60), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts13971047
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
DTBench90.7%—
LMCA38.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.13—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 45.8 (#60), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Math13881072
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#57), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
GPQA Diamond88.8%—
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—
LMArena Expert1385—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#96), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Vision1231—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 50.7 (#114), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Non-English13851064
LMArena Chinese1423—
LMArena French1412—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1379—
LMArena Korean1357—
LMArena Russian1399—
LMArena Spanish1402—

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 72.3 (#135), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Instruction Following13661061

Long Context Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#118), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Longer Query1393998

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 58.6 (#112), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Text13971098
LMArena Creative Writing13801091
LMArena Multi-Turn14061058
EQ-Bench 41075—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.3 or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.3 versus 29.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper