Model comparison

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs o4-mini

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.6 to 41.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 33 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) xAI

48.6

Rank #54 Confirmed

o4-mini OpenAI

41.6

Rank #132 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 33 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) scores higher in 7 categories and o4-mini in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads 52.3 to 24.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 65.1% for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) and 6.1% for o4-mini.
  • Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.10 / $4.40 for o4-mini.
  • Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) and o4-mini specifications
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)o4-mini
ProviderxAIOpenAI
Noometry Index48.641.6
Released2026-02-172025-04-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M200K
Max output30K100K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$1.10
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$4.40
Results tracked4660

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 42.1 (#112), o4-mini: 40.9 (#127)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)o4-mini
WeirdML52.3%52.6%
LMArena Coding14591368
ALE-Bench1,150826.17
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—45%
Aider Polyglot—72%
LMArena WebDev1375—
GSO—3.6%
CadEval—62%
AlgoTune—1.72

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 34.4 (#46), o4-mini: 32.6 (#61)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)o4-mini
Terminal-Bench57.3%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—53.2%
GDPval—25.3%
τ²-bench Banking18%—
LMArena Search1189—
METR Time Horizons—63.9%
Vending-Bench 24,663—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.3 (#32), o4-mini: 24.6 (#162)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)o4-mini
ARC-AGI-265.1%6.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%67.6%
ARC-AGI-189.5%58.7%
Chess Puzzles24%26%
LMArena Hard Prompts14511351
DTBench90.1%77.6%
LMCA38.7%26.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index151.98145.64
ForecastBench61.461.8
SimpleBench—38.7%
NYT Connections (extended)85.4%—
CritPt—0.6%
EnigmaEval—9.2%
Thematic Generalization63.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%

Math Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 48.2 (#65), o4-mini: 40.8 (#89)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)o4-mini
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)44.9%36.1%
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%4.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202592.2%81.7%
LMArena Math14551389
ProofBench14%—
Omni-MATH—72%
MATH Level 5—97.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—24.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—6.3%

Knowledge Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.8 (#60), o4-mini: 43.6 (#91)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)o4-mini
GPQA Diamond89.3%79.6%
SimpleQA Verified30.2%19.6%
LMArena Expert14391343
Humanity's Last Exam—18.1%
MMLU-Pro—82%
Confabulations—15.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—18.6%
GPQA (HELM)—73.5%

Multimodal o4-mini leads

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 33.3 (#98), o4-mini: 40.2 (#49)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)o4-mini
LMArena Vision12631194
GeoBench—64%
VPCT—57.5%
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 54.5 (#40), o4-mini: 47.0 (#154)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)o4-mini
LMArena Non-English14411337
LMArena Chinese14811354
LMArena French14761364
LMArena German14651336
LMArena Japanese14491308
LMArena Korean14171312
LMArena Russian14581334
LMArena Spanish14431347

Instruction Following Too close to call

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 74.8 (#83), o4-mini: 75.2 (#68)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)o4-mini
LMArena Instruction Following14201321
IFEval—92.8%

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 45.5 (#34), o4-mini: 45.5 (#33)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)o4-mini
LMArena Longer Query14371315
Fiction.LiveBench—77.8%
CL-bench22.2%—
CL-bench Life11.9%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) leads

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 65.7 (#44), o4-mini: 54.0 (#152)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)o4-mini
LMArena Text14511353
LMArena Creative Writing14381294
LMArena Multi-Turn14561350
Short-Story Creative Writing—75%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1574—
WildBench—85.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) better than o4-mini?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.6 to 41.6 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) or o4-mini?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; o4-mini lists at $1.10 and $4.40.

Is Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) or o4-mini better for coding?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) does, with 1M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) and o4-mini share?

33 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has 46 scored results on Noometry and o4-mini has 60.

Related comparisons

Go deeper