Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Step 5 Preview

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

45.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

43.8

Rank #78 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where Step 5 Preview leads 50.6 to 42.4.
  • Step 5 Preview is cheaper at $1 / $2.70 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Step 5 Preview specifications
Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 5 Preview
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index45.543.8
Released2026-03-092026-09-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1.02M
Max output30K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$1
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$2.70
Results tracked203

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91), Step 5 Preview: 50.6 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev—1569
SciCode—58.9%
LMArena Coding1458—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 5 Preview
LMArena Search1204—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44), Step 5 Preview: 38.0 (#58)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 5 Preview
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt—20.9%
LMArena Hard Prompts1448—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106), Step 5 Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math1441—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116), Step 5 Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert1445—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44), Step 5 Preview: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40), Step 5 Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English1440—
LMArena Chinese1475—
LMArena French1467—
LMArena German1456—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1416—
LMArena Russian1457—
LMArena Spanish1447—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80), Step 5 Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1420—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84), Step 5 Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query1430—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57), Step 5 Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text1450—
LMArena Creative Writing1435—
LMArena Multi-Turn1451—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Step 5 Preview?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is cheaper. It lists at $1 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.6 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Step 5 Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper