Model comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 44.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 Anthropic

44.0

Rank #76 Confirmed

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

45.5

Rank #62 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 42.4 to 26.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 37.3% for Claude Sonnet 4.5 and 89.6% for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $3 / $15 for Claude Sonnet 4.5.

Side by side

Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent specifications
Claude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index44.045.5
Released2025-09-292026-03-09
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output64K30K
Input $ / M tokens$3$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$15$2.50
Results tracked7320

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 47.8 (#54), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Coding14891458
SWE-bench Verified71.3%—
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)71.4%—
LMArena WebDev1393—
SWE-bench Multilingual67%—
SciCode44.7%—
GSO14.7%—
WeirdML47.7%—
ALE-Bench796.15—
AlgoTune1.52—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 38.1 (#30), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Search11591204
Terminal-Bench46.5%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard73.2%—
GDPval42.5%—
Remote Labor Index2.1%—
τ²-bench Airline72%—
τ²-bench Banking25.3%—
τ²-bench Retail72.4%—
τ²-bench Telecom84.9%—
Cybench60%—
DeepResearch Bench52.6%—
OSWorld62.9%—
METR Time Horizons67.4%—
Vending-Bench 23,839—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 26.9 (#113), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
NYT Connections (extended)37.3%89.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14621448
ARC-AGI-213.6%—
SimpleBench54.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.9%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
EnigmaEval6%—
EBR-Bench2.4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench83.2%—
LMCA38.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.84—
ForecastBench61.9—

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 31.9 (#190), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Math14481441
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)23.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 42.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
ProofBench19%—
Omni-MATH55.3%—
MATH Level 597.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)15.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 48.4 (#70), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Expert14831445
GPQA Diamond82.3%—
Humanity's Last Exam13.7%—
SimpleQA Verified30.7%—
MMLU-Pro86.9%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate12%—
GPQA (HELM)68.6%—

Multimodal Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 34.1 (#84), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Vision—1259
VPCT39.8%—
LMArena Document1450—

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 53.6 (#65), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Non-English14251440
LMArena Chinese14591475
LMArena French14591467
LMArena German14271456
LMArena Japanese13901405
LMArena Korean14031416
LMArena Russian14361457
LMArena Spanish14571447

Instruction Following Too close to call

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 75.2 (#74), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Instruction Following14591420
IFEval85%—

Long Context Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 45.2 (#45), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Longer Query14761430

Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads

Claude Sonnet 4.5: 66.7 (#33), Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude Sonnet 4.5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent
LMArena Text14391450
LMArena Creative Writing14421435
LMArena Multi-Turn14651451
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1678—
WildBench85.4%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 44.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Claude Sonnet 4.5 lists at $3 and $15.

Is Claude Sonnet 4.5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.8 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 1M tokens.

How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 73 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper