Model comparison
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Step 3.5 Flash
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.5 Flash costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 7 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 22.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 89.6% for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and 28.4% for Step 3.5 Flash.
- Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $2.50 for Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent.
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
- Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Step 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 46.2 | 42.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-09 | 2026-01-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 256K |
| Max output | 30K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.25 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1457 | 1436 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1204 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 89.6% | 28.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1448 | 1411 |
Math Step 3.5 Flash leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1442 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1445 | 1421 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1475 | 1447 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1456 | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1405 | 1354 |
| LMArena Korean | 1416 | 1352 |
| LMArena Russian | 1457 | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1447 | 1419 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1385 |
Long Context Too close to call
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1431 | 1402 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1450 | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1436 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1452 | 1405 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Step 3.5 Flash?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index. Step 3.5 Flash costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent lists at $1.25 and $2.50.
Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.0 vs 42.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Step 3.5 Flash share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.