Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 25.5.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper at $1.25 / $2.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
  • Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index46.238.1
Released2026-03-092025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M262K
Max output30K66K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$1.50
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$7.50
Results tracked2025

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding14571412
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%
LMArena Search1204—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14481372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math14421365

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert14451338

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Vision1259—

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English14401346
LMArena Chinese14751357
LMArena French14661398
LMArena German14561325
LMArena Japanese14051310
LMArena Korean14161305
LMArena Russian14571366
LMArena Spanish14471360

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14201355

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14311378

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text14501357
LMArena Creative Writing14361333
LMArena Multi-Turn14521365

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct lists at $1.50 and $7.50.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper