Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent xAI

46.2

Rank #65 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher in 9 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 43.9 to 24.8.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Large Vision
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index46.237.6
Released2026-03-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked2013

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.0 (#92), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding14571308

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Search1204—

Reasoning Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.9 (#48), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts14481257
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—

Math Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.4 (#104), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math14421268

Knowledge Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.4 (#119), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert14451252

Multimodal Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 40.5 (#48), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision12591180

Multilingual Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.4 (#43), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English14401236
LMArena Chinese14751287
LMArena Russian14571243
LMArena French1466—
LMArena German1456—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1416—
LMArena Spanish1447—

Instruction Following Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 74.8 (#84), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following14201251

Long Context Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#88), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query14311280

Writing & Preference Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.0 (#59), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

BenchmarkGrok 4.20 Multi-AgentHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text14501263
LMArena Creative Writing14361248
LMArena Multi-Turn14521254

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.2 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper