Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Arcee AISummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 leads 29.5 to 16.9.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | 1238 |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1381 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Trinity Large Thinking: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1366 |
Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | 1357 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1334 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (33.7 vs 34.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Trinity Large Thinking share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.