Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.6 to 48.9.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 40.8 | 38.0 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1307 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1436 | 1286 |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1281 |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1276 |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1464 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1266 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1447 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1277 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1342 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1438 | 1284 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.