Model comparison

Grok 4.1 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.1 xAI

41.5

Rank #134 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.4 to 27.1.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.1 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Grok 4.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderxAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.529.7
Released2025-11-172024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding14451039
LMArena WebDev1214—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Cybench39%—

Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14351028

Math Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math14221089

Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1417984

Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14251000
LMArena Chinese14651016
LMArena French14481039
LMArena German14461006
LMArena Japanese1397899
LMArena Korean1407856
LMArena Russian14341004
LMArena Spanish14381059

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14001023

Long Context Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1416996

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text14371050
LMArena Creative Writing14111024
LMArena Multi-Turn1437989

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.1 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.1 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Grok 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.7 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper