Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.1 leads 39.5 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1422 | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1448 | — |
| LMArena German | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
Grok 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.7 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.