Model comparison

Grok 4.1 vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.1 xAI

40.8

Rank #135 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.9 to 28.3.

Side by side

Grok 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Grok 4.1Muse Spark 1.1
ProviderxAIMeta
Noometry Index40.849.9
Released2025-11-172026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1936

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246), Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena WebDev12141542
LMArena Coding14451497
DeepSWE—53.3%
SciCode—58.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call

Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47), Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Muse Spark 1.1
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
Cybench39%—
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Hard Prompts14361486
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.32

Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Math14221477
ProofBench—39%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129), Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Expert14171480
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.1: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1292
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English14251471
LMArena Chinese14641518
LMArena French14481494
LMArena German14471466
LMArena Japanese13961445
LMArena Korean14071459
LMArena Russian14341482
LMArena Spanish14381471

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following14001457

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query14161463

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.1Muse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text14371479
LMArena Creative Writing14111440
LMArena Multi-Turn14381484
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.1 better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.1 or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper