Model comparison

GLM-4.6V vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.6V costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-4.6V Z.ai (Zhipu)

40.9

Rank #133 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 45.9 to 26.5.
  • GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.1.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-4.6V and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
GLM-4.6VMuse Spark 1.1
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Meta
Noometry Index40.949.9
Released2025-12-082026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1.05M
Max output33K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$0.90$4.25
Results tracked1236

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads

GLM-4.6V: 40.2 (#128), Muse Spark 1.1: 50.8 (#38)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Coding13901497
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 33.9 (#45)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VMuse Spark 1.1
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

GLM-4.6V: 26.5 (#117), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.9 (#41)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Hard Prompts13681486
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.32

Math Not comparable

GLM-4.6V: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.0 (#67)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VMuse Spark 1.1
ProofBench—39%
LMArena Math—1477

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

GLM-4.6V: 37.4 (#148), Muse Spark 1.1: 52.8 (#55)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Expert13721480
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%

Multimodal Muse Spark 1.1 leads

GLM-4.6V: 34.2 (#83), Muse Spark 1.1: 41.9 (#28)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision11641292
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads

GLM-4.6V: 48.8 (#135), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.8 (#16)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English13591471
LMArena Chinese14261518
LMArena Russian13411482
LMArena French—1494
LMArena German—1466
LMArena Japanese—1445
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads

GLM-4.6V: 71.6 (#145), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.8 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following13511457

Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads

GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#138), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#55)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query13581463

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads

GLM-4.6V: 56.8 (#132), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.6 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-4.6VMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text13771479
LMArena Creative Writing13471440
LMArena Multi-Turn13591484
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-4.6V better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.6V costs 4.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or Muse Spark 1.1?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Is GLM-4.6V or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.8 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper