Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.4 to 33.7.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 45.2 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | 1479 |
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1503 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1488 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1481 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1503 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1458 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | 1412 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1450 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | 1471 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1477 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1483 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 41.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.