Model comparison
Grok 4.1 vs Llama 3-70B
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-70B in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.1 leads 38.9 to 12.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Cybench: 39% for Grok 4.1 and 5% for Llama 3-70B.
- Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.1 | Llama 3-70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 28.8 |
| Released | 2025-11-17 | 2024-04-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3-70B leads
Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1445 | 1206 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1214 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 72% |
| MBPP+ | — | 69% |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49), Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 39% | 5% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1435 | 1195 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.93 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| WinoGrande | — | 83.5% |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1422 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1417 | 1149 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1425 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1448 | 1232 |
| LMArena German | 1446 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1397 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1438 | 1241 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1400 | 1194 |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1416 | 1174 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.1 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1411 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1437 | 1223 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.1 better than Llama 3-70B?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.1 or Llama 3-70B better for coding?
Llama 3-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 33.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 and Llama 3-70B share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.