Model comparison
Command R+ vs Grok 4.1
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 leads 29.5 to 9.2.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Grok 4.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | 2025-11-17 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.1 leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Grok 4.1: 33.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command R+: —, Grok 4.1: 34.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 39% |
Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Grok 4.1: 29.5 (#91)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1435 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Grok 4.1 leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#120)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1422 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Grok 4.1: 39.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1417 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Grok 4.1: 53.4 (#68)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1425 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | 1448 |
| LMArena German | 1216 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1407 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | 1438 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Grok 4.1: 73.8 (#111)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1400 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.1 leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#100)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1416 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Grok 4.1: 62.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1437 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Grok 4.1?
Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Grok 4.1 better for coding?
Grok 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.7 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Grok 4.1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.