Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 48.7.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1307 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1286 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1281 |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1276 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1346 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1266 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1277 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1341 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1288 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1284 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.