Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.1 Fast vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

41.4

Rank #136 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.1 Fast scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 3 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 43.4 to 24.8.

Side by side

Grok 4.1 FastHunyuan Large Vision
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index41.437.6
Released2025-06-27—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.20—
Output $ / M tokens$0.50—
Results tracked3213

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 34.1 (#245), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding14111308
LMArena WebDev1242—
ALE-Bench394.93—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#39), Hunyuan Large Vision: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Large Vision
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard69.6%—
τ²-bench Banking13.1%—
LMArena Search1171—
Vending-Bench 21,107—

Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 43.4 (#49), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts14071257
SimpleBench56%—
NYT Connections (extended)87.4%—
DTBench87.7%—
ForecastBench61—

Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 31.9 (#221), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math14081268
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions60.9%—
ProofBench4%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.1 (#207), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert13991252
Vectara Hallucination Rate17.8%—

Multimodal Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 37.0 (#76), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision12011180

Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.0 (#114), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English13911236
LMArena Chinese14411287
LMArena Russian13871243
LMArena French1415—
LMArena German1404—
LMArena Japanese1349—
LMArena Korean1361—
LMArena Spanish1413—

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.7 (#133), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following13761251

Long Context Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#126), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query13901280

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.2 (#131), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

BenchmarkGrok 4.1 FastHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text14081263
LMArena Creative Writing13941248
LMArena Multi-Turn13891254
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1327—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.1 Fast better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Grok 4.1 Fast is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.1 Fast or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.1 Fast and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.1 Fast has 32 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper