Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Hunyuan Large Vision
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 46.5.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1308 |
Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1257 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1268 |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1252 |
Multimodal Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | 1180 |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1243 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1251 |
Long Context GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1280 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1254 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.