Model comparison
Grok 3 vs o4-mini
o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 38 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 38 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 4 categories and o4-mini in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where o4-mini leads 24.6 to 13.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 5.5% for Grok 3 and 58.7% for o4-mini.
Side by side
| Grok 3 | o4-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 41.6 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | 2025-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.40 |
| Results tracked | 40 | 60 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), o4-mini: 40.9 (#127)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | 72% |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | 52.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | 1368 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 45% |
| GSO | — | 3.6% |
| CadEval | — | 62% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 826.17 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.72 |
Agentic & Tool Use o4-mini leads
Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), o4-mini: 32.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 53.2% |
| GDPval | — | 25.3% |
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 63.9% |
Reasoning o4-mini leads
Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), o4-mini: 24.6 (#162)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | 6.1% |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | 38.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | 67.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | 58.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1351 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | 145.64 |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 26% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 9.2% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 77.6% |
| LMCA | — | 26.5% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.8 |
Math o4-mini leads
Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), o4-mini: 40.8 (#89)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | 81.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | 72% |
| LMArena Math | 1391 | 1389 |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | 24.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | 6.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 36.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
Knowledge Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), o4-mini: 43.6 (#91)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 79.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | 82% |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | 15.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | 18.6% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | 73.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | 1343 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 18.1% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 19.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 3: —, o4-mini: 40.2 (#49)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1194 |
| GeoBench | — | 64% |
| VPCT | — | 57.5% |
Multilingual Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), o4-mini: 47.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | 1354 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1364 |
| LMArena German | 1431 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | 1308 |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | 1312 |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | 1334 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1347 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), o4-mini: 75.2 (#68)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 88.4% | 92.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1321 |
Long Context o4-mini leads
Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), o4-mini: 45.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | 77.8% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1315 |
Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), o4-mini: 54.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o4-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1426 | 1353 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1294 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | 75% |
| WildBench | 84.9% | 85.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | 1350 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 3 better than o4-mini?
o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 3 or o4-mini better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (41.9 vs 40.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and o4-mini share?
38 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and o4-mini has 60.