Model comparison

Grok 3 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 13.7.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Grok 3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderxAIXiaomi
Noometry Index39.950.3
Released2025-04-092026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked4019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding14321534
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
WeirdML37.2%—
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts14341512
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
CritPt—26.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33—

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math13911494
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
ProofBench—70%
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert14211543
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 3: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English14101474
LMArena Chinese14481529
LMArena Russian14161480
LMArena French1460—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1387—
LMArena Korean1373—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14091493
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14391501
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text14261492
LMArena Creative Writing14141468
LMArena Multi-Turn14251464
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper