Model comparison

Grok 3 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 26.8 to 13.7.
  • MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
Grok 3MiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderxAIXiaomi
Noometry Index39.945.2
Released2025-04-092026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked4027

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Coding14321503
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
WeirdML37.2%—
ALE-Bench—899.8

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.5-Pro
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts14341488
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
CritPt—4%
DTBench—84.5%
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33—

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math13911481
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
ProofBench—22%
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert14211503
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English14101449
LMArena Chinese14481507
LMArena French14601488
LMArena German14311458
LMArena Japanese13871412
LMArena Korean13731437
LMArena Russian14161450
LMArena Spanish14171471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following14091477
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query14391483
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3MiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text14261465
LMArena Creative Writing14141440
EQ-Bench Creative Writing11861493
LMArena Multi-Turn14251477
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
WildBench84.9%—
EQ-Bench 4—1208

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper