Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 13.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 55.6% for Grok 3 and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

Grok 3Qwen3.7 Plus
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.945.3
Released2025-04-092026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked4032

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding14321473
FrontierCode—10.2%
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
SciCode—45.5%
WeirdML37.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts14341460
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33147.37
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%93.3%
LMArena Math13911466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond75.8%87.9%
LMArena Expert14211467
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 3: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14101445
LMArena Chinese14481510
LMArena French14601473
LMArena German14311471
LMArena Japanese13871413
LMArena Korean13731415
LMArena Russian14161457
LMArena Spanish14171457

Instruction Following Too close to call

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14091440
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14391455
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14261455
LMArena Creative Writing14141439
LMArena Multi-Turn14251460
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper