Model comparison
Grok 3 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 38 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 38 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 9 categories and Llama 4 Maverick in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 3 leads 55.8 to 38.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Aider Polyglot: 53.3% for Grok 3 and 15.6% for Llama 4 Maverick.
- Llama 4 Maverick has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 3 | Llama 4 Maverick | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 30.9 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | 2025-04-05 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.65 |
| Results tracked | 40 | 54 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Llama 4 Maverick: 26.6 (#324)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | 15.6% |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | 24.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | 1302 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 21% |
| SciCode | — | 33.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49.7% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 61.4% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 172.97 |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Llama 4 Maverick: 28.2 (#91)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.3% |
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Llama 4 Maverick: 10.1 (#342)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | 0% |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | 27.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | 55.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | 4.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1281 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | 132.2 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 8% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.6% |
| DTBench | — | 61.9% |
| LMCA | — | 15.9% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
Math Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Llama 4 Maverick: 26.0 (#262)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | 20.6% |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | 42.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1391 | 1299 |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | 73% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | 0.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Llama 4 Maverick: 33.4 (#204)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 67% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | 81% |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | 22.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | 8.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | 65% |
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | 1259 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 5.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 3: —, Llama 4 Maverick: 31.6 (#105)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1142 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 31.8% |
Multilingual Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Llama 4 Maverick: 42.2 (#195)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | 1277 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1259 |
| LMArena German | 1431 | 1291 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | 1207 |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | 1203 |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | 1286 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1293 |
Instruction Following Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Llama 4 Maverick: 71.7 (#146)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 88.4% | 90.8% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1267 |
Long Context Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Llama 4 Maverick: 31.4 (#279)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | 46.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1280 |
Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Llama 4 Maverick: 38.8 (#252)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Llama 4 Maverick |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1426 | 1287 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1267 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | 62% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | 860 |
| WildBench | 84.9% | 80% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 3 better than Llama 4 Maverick?
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 3 or Llama 4 Maverick better for coding?
Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Llama 4 Maverick share?
38 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Maverick has 54.