Model comparison
Grok 3 vs Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 9 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 13.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 5.5% for Grok 3 and 87.5% for Grok 4.6.
Side by side
| Grok 3 | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 56.9 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | 2026-08-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 40 | 49 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 37.2% | 67.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | 1465 |
| DeepSWE | — | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 48% |
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | — |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1617 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |
| SciCode | — | 56.5% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,508 |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 65.3% |
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |
Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | 67.1% |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | 75.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | 87.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1447 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | 156.44 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 80% |
| CritPt | — | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| DTBench | — | 97.3% |
| LMCA | — | 48.5% |
Math Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | 99.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1391 | 1423 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 51% |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 94% |
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | 1467 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 3: —, Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 40% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1431 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | 1376 |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | 1422 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1404 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1431 |
| IFEval | 88.4% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1454 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads
Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1426 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1428 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | 1425 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| WildBench | 84.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 3 better than Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 3 or Grok 4.6 better for coding?
Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Grok 4.6 share?
24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.